Foods and feeds are made up of chemical compounds that contain essential amino acids for growth and nutrition. Analyzing the amino acid content is important to ensure proper nutrition. However, these products are produced in bulk processes. As with pharmaceutical production, bulk processes may vary in their output during a production run. Consideration must be given to what constitutes a representative sample. A subsampling strategy is usually required. Amino acid analysis of these products requires multiple approaches to properly analyze the samples for total protein composition. Because foods and feeds are produced in bulk and contain nonprotein constituents, liquid hydrolysis is recommended.
Note: The sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine and the amino acid tryptophan are not stable in standard acid hydrolysis. Alternative methodologies can be employed to effectively analyze these amino acids.
In this section, we present three different hydrolysis procedures:
When analyzing amino acids bound in proteins, the peptide bonds must be broken to free the amino acids for analysis (Figure 1). For feed protein samples to be hydrolyzed, the pH of the sample material and the presence of solids should be considered. As mentioned in the previous sections, the rate or extent of hydrolysis varies across the amino acids present in proteins. This is especially true for proteins bound in food materials. As in any hydrolysis method, the parameters selected must be the result of careful experimentation.
In the analysis of feeds, three sample preparation factors must be kept in mind:
Feed grains and similar samples are not normally uniform. To make them as uniform as possible, the samples should be ground to a fine powder. High-fat samples can be defatted by standard procedures prior to final grinding. A fine powder allows effective hydrolysis of the feed proteins. The AOAC method (4.1.11, 994.12b, J.AOAC Int. 88, 2005, Amino Acid Analysis of Feeds) calls for the test sample to be ground until it passes through a 0.25 mm, or 60 mesh, sieve (250 µm particle size).
The AOAC method for feed analysis of amino acids recommends the following calculation to be used to determine the sample amount used in a feed analysis.
Calculate the approximate amount of test portion to use as follows:
Ws = 1000/Ns
where Ns = nitrogen content of test portion (%), and Ws = weight of test material equivalent to 10 mg nitrogen content (mg).
In general, this will fall in the range of 100–1000 mg of the material for each sample analyzed.
As noted previously, a large weight excess of acid is necessary for effective hydrolysis of protein samples. Feeds are no different. However, unlike the 100-fold excess discussed in Section 2.1.2, the ratio of acid weight added to sample weight ranges from 50- to 500-fold in the AOAC Method 994.12. This range and the presence of bulk nonprotein particulate materials in feeds point to the need for a careful range-finding study prior to routine use for feed analysis.
The use of an internal standard (IS) best compensates for variable hydrolysis of the individual amino acids of the sample. Waters recommends using Norvaline (Nva) as IS for AccQ•Tag Ultra on UPLC, and Alpha-Aminobutyric Acid (AABA) or Norleucine for AccQ•Tag on HPLC. The internal standard recommended in the AOAC method 994.12 for feed analysis is Norleucine. Caution should be taken when choosing an IS to ensure the desired resolutions can be achieved between the amino acid peaks in the chromatography.
The literature contains a variety of methods that can be adapted to the analysis of amino acids in feeds. The method presented here is adapted from AOAC Method 994.12 Amino Acids in Feeds.
Sodium citrate buffer—pH 2.20
Internal standard solution
Cysteine and methionine are critical amino acids in the analysis of feed materials; both are growth-limiting for the animals consuming the feed. Because standard acid hydrolysis conditions do not work for these specific amino acids, an alternative oxidation using performic acid is commonly performed. This approach converts cysteine and cystine to cyanuric acid, and methionine to methionine sulfone (Figure 3). The samples can then be acid-hydrolyzed and derivatized effectively.
In literature, there are multiple versions of performic acid oxidation. Although the overall processes are similar, their specifics differ. This guide presents two procedures to use as possible starting points. The first method is from the AOAC 994.12. The second is an alternative method based on MacDonald et al, 1985. Careful evaluation and optimization is necessary before you commit to a specific approach.
Sodium citrate buffer—pH 2.20
6. The sample is ready to be prepared for derivatization.
Note: Literature contains many different references for this assay. No two agree on the amounts of performic acid and hydrogen bromide or the evaporation temperature. Changing the amounts and/or temperature will affect the time of evaporation in Step 7.
Under the standard conditions of acid hydrolysis, tryptophan (Trp) is unstable and cannot be analyzed effectively. Base hydrolysis is proposed as an alternative method for the release and analysis of this amino acid in feeds. This method uses 4.2 M NaOH to hydrolyze the protein. An advantage of this method is that upon completion there is no need for a derivatization step. Instrumental analysis using UV detection at 280 nm is all that is required.
The procedure presented here is adapted from AOAC Method 988.15 Tryptophan in Foods and Food and Feed Ingredients.
Note: At this point you can take an aliquot of the supernatant to UV (289 nm) analysis, without derivatization.
Comprehensive Guide to Hydrolysis and Analysis of Amino Acids
Hydrolysis of Purified Proteins and Peptides
Hydrolysis of Food and Feed Samples
Operation of the Eldex Hydrolysis/Derivatization Workstation for Liquid- and Vapor-Phase Hydrolysis
Operation of the CEM Discover SP Microwave Reaction System for Amino Acid Hydrolysis
Derivatization of Amino Acids Using Waters AccQ•Tag Chemistry